The Best Advice About Articles I’ve Ever Written

Legal Directories A legal directory is also called a law blogging site and an online law journal in other quarters. The online law journal has entries in a reverse chronological order. Trust these sites for any legal information and various judgments. It is possible to publish information found in the legal directory because of the strength of its software. The software in the legal directory allows even first-time authors to submit their work. The site is important all stakeholders in legal matters. Practice groups, law firms and individual attorneys find legal directories useful to their work. It increases their reliability and legal authority. It is a type of centralized approach that lets members of the legal fraternity to quickly and easily share knowledge. Having a law journal blog earns loyalty to law firms and lawyers. You would succeed as an attorney when you use legal directories as a marketing option.
A Quick Rundown of Blogging
Most scholars in the legal profession concur in defining legal precedent as sources of the law that involve past decisions by various juries developing law for use by other judges in future when making decisions on related or similar cases. For instance, The United Kingdom judicial system applies precedence based on stare decisis. Including translations the English system developed from Latin
A Quick Rundown of Blogging
Loosely, it means standing by decisions already made. It is the responsibility of stare decisis to offer certainty and fairness in law. This is in two segments: obiter dicta and ratio decidendi. The law based on by a judge to arrive at a particular judgment while concluding the case defines what ratio decidendi entails. Issues applied by a judge in the delivery of a particular decision must fall in the speech provided at the end of the case. On the surface, ratio decidendi refers to a rule implied or expressed by a judge as an important factor in arriving at his or her conclusion. On the other hand, obiter dictum constitutes issues said by the presiding judge according to the legal dictionary. Included in the list is the another judge’s in the future can follow. An illustrated case of obiter dicta could be the decision of the judge if the facts turn out as different from the previous case. It is for this reason that the old facts cannot bind the new judge while reaching his conclusion. In other occasions, cutting an exact difference between obiter dicta and ratio decidendi becomes difficult because they flow in a continuous manner. While making judgment in the Broome v. Cassell case, Lord Hailsham from Marylebone put forth that, it is a necessity for every court in the lower tie to agree loyally with decisions made by courts above in the hierarchy. The Court of Appeal was included because it comes second in command.